The Weekly Read

Transnational Queer Materialism | The Weekly Read

The Weekly Read for April 27, 2024, is “Transnational Queer Materialism” by Rana M. Jaleel and Evren Savci. The article is the introduction to a recent special issue of South Atlantic Quarterly edited by the authors.

Read this article for free through June 30, 2024.
Buy this special issue and use coupon code SAVE30 for a 30% discount.

Cover of "Transnational Queer Materialism" a thematic issue of South Atlantic Quarterly (123:1). A white background with a color photograph of a brightly colored sculpture that appears to be a hammer and sickle. The journal logo and issue title are in gray and white text.

The introduction to this special issue takes up the narrations and values produced by the travels of words like queer of colorrace, and racial capitalism to both comobilize and retheorize queer of color critique and the content and contours of global racial capitalism. With and beyond the story of US empire and the transatlantic slave trade—from peripheral European engagements with Africa to the circulation of caste in Africa via Indian Ocean worlds—in this special issue the authors examine some of the histories and present modes of capitalist accumulation that are relevant to telling global stories of race and capitalism. A queer/trans lens keeps the authors’ attention trained as well on the arrangements and estrangements of the sex/gender systems that power such narratives of race and capitalism. So positioned, the authors enter ongoing debates on the geopolitics of queer studies, the import of queer materialism, and theorizations of racial capitalism by asking (1) What is the “racial” of racial capitalism?, and (2) What is the “of color” in queer/trans of color critique? The questions form a method for thinking global racial capitalism and queer/trans of color study together—what the authors call transnational queer materialism.

The South Atlantic Quarterly, founded amid controversy in 1901, provides bold analyses of the current intellectual scene, both nationally and worldwide. Published exclusively in guest-edited special issues, this award-winning centenarian journal features some of the most prominent contemporary writers and scholars tackling urgent political, cultural, and social questions. Some issues grow out of current academic debates, concerning, for example, the growing power of finance, narratives of black leadership, and the politics of austerity.

The Weekly Read is a weekly feature in which we highlight articles, books, and chapters that are freely available online. You’ll be able to find a link to the selection here on the blog as well as on our social media channels. Enjoy The Weekly Read, and check back next week for something new to read for free.

“If You’re Going to Be Beautiful, You Better Be Dangerous”: Sex Worker Community Defense | The Weekly Read

The Weekly Read for April 20, 2024, is “‘If You’re Going to Be Beautiful, You Better Be Dangerous’: Sex Worker Community Defense” by Heather Berg. The article appears in “Feminists Confront State Violence” a recent issue of Radical History Review.

Read this article for free through May 18, 2024.
Buy this special issue and use coupon code SAVE30 for a 30% discount.

Abstract
Refusing both sex workers’ state-produced vulnerability to violence and the state’s monopoly on protection, sex worker radicals articulate community defense as a practice of care. Grounded in interviews with thinkers of the sex worker Left and in sex workers’ cultural production, this article explores sex worker community defense with an eye to its relationship to past struggles and contributions to future ones. Chief among those is the abolitionist struggle for a world beyond prisons and policing. Sex worker abolitionists identify a tension between a vision of transformative justice that rejects violence and the understanding that transformation might not come without injury to those who do violence on behalf of the state. Sex worker abolitionists seek resources for navigating this tactical ambivalence in Black radical, decolonial, and queer and feminist traditions. Many wonder if building new worlds will require a transitional program of militant community defense, even retribution.

For more than forty-five years, Radical History Review has stood at the point where rigorous historical scholarship and active political engagement converge. The journal is edited by a collective of historians with diverse backgrounds, research interests, and professional perspectives. Articles in RHR address issues of gender, race, sexuality, imperialism, and class, stretching the boundaries of historical analysis to explore Western and non-Western histories. RHR includes sections devoted to public history and the art of teaching as well as reviews of a wide range of media—from books to television and from websites to museum exhibitions—thus celebrating the vast potential for historical learning in the twenty-first century.

The Weekly Read is a weekly feature in which we highlight articles, books, and chapters that are freely available online. You’ll be able to find a link to the selection here on the blog as well as on our social media channels. Enjoy The Weekly Read, and check back next week for something new to read for free.

Smallpox and the Choctaw Civil War | The Weekly Read

The Weekly Read for April 13, 2024, is “Smallpox and the Choctaw Civil War” by Matthew J. Sparacio. The article appears in “Indigenous Responses to Disease: Ethnohistory Inspired by COVID” a recent issue of Ethnohistory.

Read this article for free through May 31, 2024.
Buy this special issue and use coupon code SAVE30 for a 30% discount.

Cover of "Indigenous Responses to Disease: Ethnohistory Inspired by COVID," a special issue of Ethnohistory (71:1). Red cover with black text. A color photograph of manuscript is in the center.

Abstract
The presence of chilakwa (smallpox) in Choctaw villages between 1747 and 1748 complicated factionalism and civil war. Utilizing Sharla Fett’s approach to health culture—defined as “the social relations of healing”—this article outlines how eighteenth-century Choctaws arrived at acceptable contingency plans when faced with illness and argues that community responses to smallpox helped ease factional tensions. Iksa (moiety) obligations for funeral rites—embodying the notion of iyyi kowa (generosity)—bridged political differences, accounting for a period of collaboration between groups best understood as the “smallpox peace.” Smallpox, therefore, surprisingly did not immediately contribute to political instability, although its indirect consequences proved significant during later stages of the civil war. Choctaw health culture informed individual and communal responses to chilakwa, which in turn shaped Choctaw factionalism.

Ethnohistory, the journal of the American Society for Ethnohistory, reflects the wide range of current scholarship inspired by anthropological and historical approaches to the human condition around the world, but with a particular emphasis on the Americas. Of particular interest are those analyses and interpretations that seek to make evident the experiences, organizations, and identities of indigenous, diasporic, and minority peoples that otherwise elude the histories and anthropologies of nations, states, and colonial empires. The journal welcomes a theoretical and cross-cultural discussion of ethnohistorical materials and publishes work from the disciplines of art history, geography, literature, archaeology, anthropology, and history, among others.

The Weekly Read is a weekly feature in which we highlight articles, books, and chapters that are freely available online. You’ll be able to find a link to the selection here on the blog as well as on our social media channels. Enjoy The Weekly Read, and check back next week for something new to read for free.

Adorno’s “Urbanism and Societal Order” and the State of Rebuilding West Germany, 1949 | The Weekly Read

The Weekly Read for March 30, 2024, is “Adorno’s ‘Urbanism and Societal Order’ and the State of Rebuilding West Germany, 1949” by Lynnette Widder. The article appears in the recent “Visual Culture Issue” of New German Critique.

Read this article for free through May 31, 2024.
Buy this special issue and use coupon code SAVE30 for a 30% discount.

Cover of "Visual Culture Issue," a special issue of New German Critique (number 151). Features black and white text over a red background.

Less than a month after his return to Frankfurt in the winter of 1949, Theodor Adorno gave a lecture at the Technical University of Darmstadt at the invitation of the urban designer Karl Gruber. Titled “Urbanism and Societal Order,” the lecture is noteworthy as one of the very few Adorno texts that addresses architecture. It might be considered a minor text if not for the fact that each issue Adorno raised in it has a corollary in the early postwar practice and discourse of architecture in West Germany. The qualities of urban beauty, the legitimacy of historical and historicizing urban fabric, the nature of housing worthy of a free citizenry, the importance of self-determinacy and participation in the planning of cities: these are among the topics that Adorno’s text interrogates. Each consideration is discussed relative to specific contemporaneous texts, debates, and projects by the architects who ultimately rebuilt West Germany’s cities.

Widely considered the leading journal in its field, New German Critique is an interdisciplinary periodical that focuses on twentieth- and twenty-first-century German studies and publishes articles on a wide array of subjects, including literature, mass culture, film, and other visual media; literary theory and cultural studies; Holocaust studies; art and architecture; political and social theory; and intellectual history and philosophy. Established in the early 1970s, the journal has played a significant role in introducing US readers to the Frankfurt School and remains an important forum for debate in the humanities and the social sciences.

The Weekly Read is a weekly feature in which we highlight articles, books, and chapters that are freely available online. You’ll be able to find a link to the selection here on the blog as well as on our social media channels. Enjoy The Weekly Read, and check back next week for something new to read for free.

Dancing and Rapping the Good Life: Sharing Aspirations and Values in Vietnamese Hip-Hop | The Weekly Read

The Weekly Read for March 23, 2024, is “Dancing and Rapping the Good Life: Sharing Aspirations and Values in Vietnamese Hip-Hop” by Sandra Kurfürst. The article appears in “the good life in late-socialist asia: aspirations, politics, and possibilities” a recent issue of positions: asia critique.

Read this article for free through May 31, 2024.
Buy this special issue and use coupon code SAVE30 for a 30% discount.

Cover of "the good life in late-socialist asia: aspirations, politics, and possibilities," a special issue of positions: asia critique. A pink cover with black text. Center is a color photograph of a wall showing various utility infrastructure.

Abstract
Rap and hip-hop’s diverse dance styles have been practiced in Vietnam since the 1990s, shortly after the country’s integration into the world economy. What started out as a sphere of popular culture dominated by men was soon appropriated by female artists. The female rapper Suboi, Vietnam’s “Queen of Rap,” is internationally renowned, and more and more young women are engaging in dancing on the streets. This article investigates the aspirations of female hip-hop practitioners in Vietnam’s major cities, Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. What does leading the good life mean to them, and how do they navigate the ambiguous moral landscape coproduced by authoritarianism and liberalism? Drawing on Aihwa Ong’s (2008) concept of self-fashioning and AbdouMaliq Simone’s (2019) practices of crafting, harvesting, and detachment, this article examines how young women use hip-hop as a creative device to achieve personal freedom and make a career for themselves. Carving out spaces for themselves in the male-dominated rap industry and dance community, they negotiate existing gender norms in both the music genre and Vietnam’s urban society.

Offering a fresh approach to Asia scholarship, positions develops theoretical, philosophical, historical, and critical approaches in a forum open to debate. In expansive scholarly articles, commentaries, poetry, visual art, and political and philosophical debates, contributors consider a broad variety of pressing questions. Thematic issues tackle new, sometimes pathbreaking areas of concern (or traditional areas from a fresh vantage point) and are interspersed with general issues offering scholarship that calls our scholarly assumptions into question and expands our various archives. The breadth and pace of the journal ensure that readers seeking to add “Asia” to their areas of critical competency are included in our debates, challenged and informed.

The Weekly Read is a weekly feature in which we highlight articles, books, and chapters that are freely available online. You’ll be able to find a link to the selection here on the blog as well as on our social media channels. Enjoy The Weekly Read, and check back next week for something new to read for free.

Dropping the Bond or Dropping the Act? | The Weekly Read

The Weekly Read for March 16, 2024, is “Dropping the Bond or Dropping the Act?” by Elizabeth Stewart. The article appears in “Social Bonds and Catastrophic Acts” a recent issue of differences.

Read this article for free through May 31, 2024.
Buy this special issue and use coupon code SAVE30 for a 30% discount.

Cover of "Social Bonds and Catastrophic Acts," a special issue of differences: a journal of feminist cultural studies, volume 34, number 3. Black background with white text. A blue bar with the journal's title in yellow crosses in the top quarter.

Throughout the United States, in 2020 and 2021, the Trump presidency and the covid-19 pandemic brought to light clashes in shared and lived realities among Americans and displayed them in jarring and perplexing scenarios—with a deadly toll. Strange martyrdoms and enacted oaths of loyalty to Trump in the form of people not getting vaccinated, not taking precautions, often attacking those who did, and throwing themselves away by (simply) dying are collective examples of what Jacques Lacan called the passage à l’acte and are symptoms of a profound decay of political culture. Radicalization of what Timothy Snyder has called “sadopopulism” and Chris Hedges has called “corporate totalitarianism” have led to a pervasive sense of impotence among large swaths of global populations who have been, and are being, abandoned and discarded, made victims of radical neglect, disappearance, and silencing—the covid martyrs a category among them.

differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies first appeared in 1989 at the moment of a critical encounter—a head-on collision, one might say—of theories of difference (primarily Continental) and the politics of diversity (primarily American). In the ensuing years, the journal has established a critical forum where the problematic of differences is explored in texts ranging from the literary and the visual to the political and social. differences highlights theoretical debates across the disciplines that address the ways concepts and categories of difference—notably but not exclusively gender—operate within culture.

The Weekly Read is a weekly feature in which we highlight articles, books, and chapters that are freely available online. You’ll be able to find a link to the selection here on the blog as well as on our social media channels. Enjoy The Weekly Read, and check back next week for something new to read for free.

“Criminalization is the Antithesis of Care”: Contextualizing the Dobbs Decision with Black Queer Abolitionist Feminism | The Weekly Read

The Weekly Read for March 9, 2024, is “‘Criminalization is the Antithesis of Care’: Contextualizing the Dobbs Decision with Black Queer Abolitionist Feminism,” a conversation with Sarah Haley, Andrea Ritchie, and Emily Thuma. The discussion is included in Q2, a new editorial section in GLQ.

Cover of GLQ volume 30, number 1. A red cover with the journal logo and title at the top. An inset image looks like a pencil drawing of a young person wearing a t-shirt with the word "In The Inside" on the front. They have tattoos on their forearms and are holding cat-eyed sunglasses up to their face.

On June 13, 2023, Sarah Haley and Andrea Ritchie discussed the long histories of gender violence, anti-Blackness, and state repression and the strategies and resources of abolition feminism for responding to the post-Dobbs moment, with Emily Thuma as moderator. This is a lightly edited transcript of that conversation.

Read this article for free through April 30, 2024.

Providing a much-needed forum for interdisciplinary discussion, GLQ publishes scholarship, criticism, and commentary in areas as diverse as law, science studies, religion, political science, and literary studies. Its aim is to offer queer perspectives on all issues touching on sex and sexuality.

The Weekly Read is a weekly feature in which we highlight articles, books, and chapters that are freely available online. You’ll be able to find a link to the selection here on the blog as well as on our social media channels. Enjoy The Weekly Read, and check back next week for something new to read for free.

Arts in a Changing America: The Weekly Read

Cover of Future/Present: Arts in a Changing America, edited by Daniela Alvarez, Roberta Uno, and Elizabeth M. Webb. Cover consists of two vertical bands woven into a piece of fabric with a multicolored, geometric pattern. The bands are black and white and come to a point midway down the cover. The geometric fabric consists of a variety of shapes in primary colors, boldly contrasting the black and white of the bands.

The Weekly Read is FUTURE/PRESENT: Arts in a Changing America, edited by Daniela Alvarez, Roberta Uno, & Elizabeth M. Webb. Building on five years of national organizing by Arts in a Changing America, an artist-led initiative that challenges structural racism in the art world, the book includes a range of poetry, essays and criticism, visual and performance art, artist manifestos, interviews, and reflections on community practice. Darren Walker, president of the Ford Foundation, writes that “FUTURE/PRESENT is an essential testament to the crucial work that artists, thinkers, and organizers are doing to work toward a more equitable future.” Daniela Alvarez is REFRAME editor and Research Manager at Arts in a Changing America, and Public Programs Coordinator at the Getty Museum. Roberta Uno is a theater director and Founding Director of Arts in a Changing America. Elizabeth M. Webb is an artist and filmmaker and Senior Creative Producer at Arts in a Changing America. Read this fascinating collection now for free! This title is made open-access due to funding from ArtChangeUS.

The Weekly Read is a weekly feature in which we highlight articles, books, and chapters that are freely available online. You’ll be able to find a link to the selection here on the blog as well as on our social media channels. Enjoy The Weekly Read, and check back next week for something new to read for free.

How to Build a Hybrid: The Structure of Imagination | The Weekly Read

The Weekly Read for February 24, 2024, is “How to Build a Hybrid: The Structure of Imagination” by Yeshayahu Shen and David Gil. The article appears in “Visual Hybrids” a recent issue of Poetics Today.

Read this article for free through March 31, 2024.
Buy this special issue and use coupon code SAVE30 for a 30% discount.

Cover of "Poetics Today" volume 44, issue 4. A textured light beige background with the journal title in brown text centered in the upper third. Volume and issue information in small black text at the bottom.

Abstract
How do we conjure up novel and unfamiliar entities in our imagination? Thomas Ward and others have suggested that we do so by deriving such entities from ordinary familiar ones. Hybrids, however, pose a challenge to this view since they are not derived from any one single familiar entity. Nevertheless, we argue here that the construction of hybrid entities is indeed governed by principles forming part of our structured imagination. These principles refer to a set of five abstract schemas, defined in terms of properties such as parts, symmetry, and spatial orientation. These schemas, alongside the absence of a schema, together constitute a schematological hierarchy: humanoid (e.g., man) > canoid (e.g., dog) > carroid (e.g., car) > culteroid (e.g., knife) > arboid (e.g., tree) > other (e.g., sponge). When forming a hybrid out of two or more entities, or parents, the overall shape of the hybrid is selected in accordance with the following three principles: (1) coherence: presence of a schema is preferred to absence of a schema; (2) accessibility: a schema corresponding to that of one of the parents is preferred to some other schema; and (3) height: a schema higher on the schematological hierarchy is preferred to a schema lower on the schematological hierarchy. To test these principles empirically, we conducted a large-scale experiment, in which art and design students were given pairs of words denoting familiar objects and asked to draw images of hybrid entities formed from these word pairs. The resulting corpus of 356 hybrids was found to provide strong empirical support for the above three principles. In doing so, it showed how human creativity is not unbound, but rather subject to substantive cognitive constraints, constituting our structured imagination.

Poetics Today brings together scholars from throughout the world who are concerned with developing systematic approaches to the study of literature (e.g., semiotics and narratology) and with applying such approaches to the interpretation of literary works. Poetics Today presents a remarkable diversity of methodologies and examines a wide range of literary and critical topics. Several thematic special issues are published in each volume, and each issue contains a book review section.

The Weekly Read is a weekly feature in which we highlight articles, books, and chapters that are freely available online. You’ll be able to find a link to the selection here on the blog as well as on our social media channels. Enjoy The Weekly Read, and check back next week for something new to read for free.

A Refuge from Science: The Practice and Politics of Rights in Brazil’s Vaccine Revolt | The Weekly Read

The Weekly Read for February 17, 2024, is “A Refuge from Science: The Practice and Politics of Rights in Brazil’s Vaccine Revolt” by Pedro Jimenez Cantisano. The article was the recipient of The James Alexander Robertson Memorial Prize for the best article published in the Hispanic American Historical Review in the previous calendar year. The award was presented at The Conference on Latin American History last month.

The article appears in volume 102, issue 4, of HAHR. Read it for free through March 31, 2024.

Abstract
This article considers the rights-based opposition that helped fuel Rio de Janeiro’s 1904 Vaccine Revolt. I argue that the revolt was embedded in sociolegal conflicts about the policing of homes. In the early twentieth century, empowered by new laws, public health agents invaded homes to disinfect them with sulfur to kill the mosquitoes that transmitted yellow fever, and to vaccinate residents against smallpox. An elite coalition invoked the constitutional right to the home’s inviolability against state interference in this private space. For working-class people, this rights language resonated with long-lasting struggles for inclusion and equality. Since the nineteenth century, they had associated their homes with freedom, honor, and autonomy. Moreover, judicial records reveal that a less diverse group composed of immigrants, property owners, and labor leaders requested court orders to stop forced residential disinfections. This article shows how resistance in courts and on the streets mutually fueled each other.

The Hispanic American Historical Review is published quarterly by Duke University Press in cooperation with the Conference on Latin American History and the American Historical Association.

Founded in 1918 at Duke University, HAHR pioneered the study of Latin American history and culture in the United States. Today, it maintains a distinguished tradition of publishing vital work across thematic, chronological, regional, and methodological specializations. It is generally recognized as the preeminent journal in the field of Latin American history. HAHR publishes peer-reviewed articles featuring original, innovative research and path-breaking analysis.

The Weekly Read is a weekly feature in which we highlight articles, books, and chapters that are freely available online. You’ll be able to find a link to the selection here on the blog as well as on our social media channels. Enjoy The Weekly Read, and check back next week for something new to read for free.